CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO THE INTEGRATION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTO SIMULATION-BASED TRAINING FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/eddiscourses/2026-3-19

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, simulation-based medical education, clinical reasoning, large language models, health professions education

Abstract

The rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming medical education by creating new opportunities for simulation-based learning, clinical reasoning development, and personalized educational support. Despite increasing adoption of large language models in health professions education, their integration into simulation remains fragmented, with limited methodological guidance and a lack of standardized pedagogical frameworks. To develop a conceptual model for integrating GenAI into simulation-based medical education and to define methodological principles for its safe, pedagogically sound, and evidence-based implementation. A narrative analysis of contemporary literature, international recommendations, and methodological documents published between 2023 and 2026 was conducted. Current evidence regarding the educational applications, benefits, limitations, ethical considerations, and implementation strategies of GenAI in medical education and healthcare simulation was synthesized. Based on these findings, a conceptual framework and methodological principles for GenAI integration into simulation-based learning were developed. The proposed framework integrates GenAI across all stages of simulation-based education, including scenario design, educational content generation, adaptive virtual patient interactions, clinical reasoning support, formative feedback, debriefing assistance, and reflective learning. Eight methodological principles were identified: pedagogical appropriateness, prioritization of clinical reasoning, human-in-the-loop supervision, evidence-based clinical content, comprehensive integration throughout the simulation process, academic integrity, ethics and data privacy, and continuous educational evaluation. The model emphasizes that GenAI should augment rather than replace educators, with faculty maintaining responsibility for instructional design, expert validation of AI-generated content, learner assessment, and educational debriefing. GenAI has considerable potential to enhance simulation-based medical education by improving educational efficiency, adaptability, and learner engagement. However, its successful implementation requires standardized pedagogical frameworks, continuous human oversight, adherence to evidence-based medicine, academic integrity, ethical principles, and data protection. The proposed conceptual model provides a methodological foundation for the responsible integration of GenAI into undergraduate medical education and may support future research evaluating its educational effectiveness and impact on competency development

References

Triola M. M., Rodman A. Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence Into Medical Education: Curriculum, Policy, and Governance Strategies. Academic Medicine. 2025. Vol. 100, № 4. P. 413-418. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005963.

Ganjavi C., Eppler M., O’Brien D. et al. ChatGPT and Large Language Models (LLMs) Awareness and Use: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Survey of U.S. Medical Students. PLOS Digital Health. 2024. Vol. 3, № 9. Article e0000596. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000596.

Tran C., Hryciw B. N., Moore S. W. et al. Perceptions and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Students: A Multicenter Survey. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2025. Vol. 12. Article 23821205251391969. DOI: 10.1177/23821205251391969.

Neo N. W. S., Gunawan J., Levett-Jones T., Khoo E. T., Chua W. L., Liaw S. Y. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Simulation-Based Education: A Scoping Review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2025. Vol. 108. Article 101819. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101819.

Komasawa N., Yokohira M. Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medical Education: A Narrative Review of the Challenges and Possibilities for Future Professionalism. Cureus. 2025. Vol. 17, № 6. Article e86316. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.86316.

Miao F., Holmes W. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris : UNESCO, 2023. 64 p. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

Association of American Medical Colleges. Principles for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in and for Medical Education. Version 2.0. Washington (DC) : Association of American Medical Colleges, 2025. URL: https://www.aamc.org/about-us/mission-areas/medical-education/principles-ai-use

Masters K., MacNeil H., Benjamin J. et al. Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education Assessment: AMEE Guide № 178. Medical Teacher. 2025. Vol. 47, № 9. P. 1410-1424. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2445037.

Liu M., Okuhara T., Chang X. et al. Performance of ChatGPT Across Different Versions in Medical Licensing Examinations Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024. Vol. 26. Article e60807. DOI: 10.2196/60807.

Bicknell B. T., Butler D., Whalen S. et al. ChatGPT-4 Omni Performance in USMLE Disciplines and Clinical Skills: Comparative Analysis. JMIR Medical Education. 2024. Vol. 10. Article e63430. DOI: 10.2196/63430.

Brin D., Sorin V., Konen E. et al. How GPT Models Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination: A Systematic Review. Discover Applied Sciences. 2024. Vol. 6. Article 500. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-024-06194-5.

Shieh A., Tran B., He G. et al. Assessing ChatGPT 4.0’s Test Performance and Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy on USMLE STEP 2 CK and Clinical Case Reports. Scientific Reports. 2024. Vol. 14, № 1. Article 9330. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58760-x.

Thomae A. V., Witt C. M., Barth J. Integration of ChatGPT Into a Course for Medical Students: Explorative Study on Teaching Scenarios, Students’ Perception, and Applications. JMIR Medical Education. 2024. Vol. 10. Article e50545. DOI: 10.2196/50545.

Xu T., Weng H., Liu F. et al. Current Status of ChatGPT Use in Medical Education: Potentials, Challenges, and Strategies. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024. Vol. 26. Article e57896. DOI: 10.2196/57896.

Кучин Ю. Л., Канюра О. А., Мельник В. С., Стучинська Н. В., Микитенко П. В. Симуляційні технології у системі підготовки майбутніх лікарів в умовах Covid-19. Науковий часопис НПУ імені М.П. Драгоманова. Серія 5. Педагогічні науки: реалії та перспективи: Збірник наукових праць. Київ: Видавничий дім «Гельветика». 2022. Вип. 86. С. 132–142.

Xu X., Chen Y., Miao J. Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions of Large Language Models, Including Chat-GPT in Medical Education: A Systematic Scoping Review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 2024. Vol. 21. Article 6. DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.6.

Tscholl D. W., Ebensperger M., Rahrisch A. et al. Generative AI in Simulation Debriefings: An Exploratory Study Using the Team-FIRST Framework and Qualitative Feedback from Simulation Experts and Learners. Advances in Simulation. 2026. Vol. 11. Article 14. DOI: 10.1186/s41077-026-00407-0

Downloads

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

Pavliukovych , N., & Pavliukovych , O. (2026). CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO THE INTEGRATION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTO SIMULATION-BASED TRAINING FOR MEDICAL STUDENTS. Медицина та фармація: освітні дискурси, (3), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.32782/eddiscourses/2026-3-19