FORMING BIOETHICAL COMPETENCE IN FUTURE DOCTORS OF PHILOSOPHY: CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/eddiscourses/2026-1-11Keywords:
bioethics, competence, Doctor of Philosophy, interdisciplinary nature, ethics, integrity, philosophyAbstract
The article discusses the importance of developing bioethical competence among future Doctor of Philosophy candidates in the field of “Healthcare and Social Welfare” within the context of modern educational training requirements. The relevance of the topic is underscored by the necessity to integrate bioethics into curricula governed by current legislation in Ukraine, as well as the increasing demands for ethical standards in scientific research within medical practice. The authors emphasize that the formation of general scientific (philosophical) competencies, such as critical analysis, creative synthesis, and adherence to principles of academic integrity, is crucial for preparing highly qualified specialists.The article also highlights the main challenges faced by higher education institutions, such as the lack of unified standards for teaching bioethics, and proposes strategies to overcome these challenges, including the development of interdisciplinary programs and active engagement of professionals from various fields. The authors stress the interdisciplinary nature of bioethics, which requires the integration of knowledge from medicine, philosophy, law, and social sciences. The use of diverse teaching methods, such as case studies and role-playing, fosters a deeper understanding of the ethical aspects arising during clinical practice and research.It is emphasized that bioethics plays a critical role in shaping responsible medical practice and ensuring public trust in scientific outcomes. The article stresses the need for a systematic approach to teaching bioethics to develop the professional and ethical competencies of future Doctor of Philosophy candidates. Importantly, it notes that cultivating bioethical competence not only enhances the level of professional training but also encourages active participation in ethical discussions that arise in medical practice. This, in turn, helps to establish an ethical culture in medicine, which is vital for societal development in the face of contemporary challenges. The authors call for the implementation of innovative approaches in the educational process that align with modern requirements and standards, enabling the preparation of specialists capable of effectively addressing complex ethical issues in their practice.
References
Adler D., Zlotnik Shaul R. Disciplining Bioethics: Towards a Standard of Methodological Rigor in Bioethics Research. Accountability in Research, 2012. 19(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.692971
Agich G. J. The Question of Method in Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics, 2001. 1(4), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/152651601317139360
Arras J. Methods in Bioethics (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780190665982.001.0001
Crowden A., Gildersleeve M. Teaching Bioethics to Scientists. In Educating for Ethical Survival. 2020. (pp. 153–160). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-209620200000024013
DeGrazia David., Millum Joseph. A theory of bioethics. Cambridge University Press. 2021.
Hololobova K. O., Hrytsenko O. A., Kucherenko I. I. Motivating academic integrity: utilizing information resources in medical education. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 2025. (5), 1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek/205376
Kucherenko I. I., Mykytenko P. V., Gruzieva T. S., Chebotarenko A. H., Zolotov D. V., Hololobova K. О. RESEARCH OF READINESS FOR THE APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL EDUCATION. Clinical and Preventive Medicine, 2025. (4), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.4.2025.11
Peter Horn. The Philosophical Basis of Bioethics. Clinical Therapeutics (Volume 37, Issue 6, June 2015), 2015. 37(6).
Закон України “Про Академічну Доброчесність,” Pub. L. 10392 (2025) 18.12.2025.






